Most support workers have never been properly trained on what counts as a restrictive practice under NDIS rules. The term sounds extreme — like strapping someone to a bed. But the legal definition is much broader than that, and it covers actions that happen in ordinary shifts every day.
Under the NDIS (Restrictive Practices and Behaviour Support) Rules 2018, there are five types of regulated restrictive practice. Each one requires specific documentation, authorisation, and reporting. Using one without knowing it’s a restrictive practice doesn’t exempt you from the requirements — it just means the documentation doesn’t get done.
The five types
Why this matters
Every time a regulated restrictive practice is used, the law requires a full record under Section 15(2) of the Restrictive Practices Rules. That record must include: the type of practice, who used it, who authorised it, start and end time, the behaviour that led to it, what less restrictive alternatives were tried first, whether it was in accordance with the person’s behaviour support plan, and the impact on the participant.
If the practice is authorised under the participant’s BSP, it must be reported monthly to the NDIS Commissioner. If it’s not authorised, it’s a reportable incident under category RI6 — Unauthorised Restrictive Practice — and requires immediate supervisor notification.
The gap: workers use these practices because they’re keeping someone safe. They don’t think of it as “restrictive practice” because they’re thinking about the person, not the paperwork. But without the documentation, there’s no legal record — and that’s a compliance risk for both the worker and the provider.
What good documentation looks like
When a restrictive practice is used and properly documented, the record protects everyone. It shows the worker tried less restrictive options first. It shows the practice was authorised under the BSP. It shows the participant was checked afterwards. It shows the right people were notified. That’s not paperwork for paperwork’s sake — it’s evidence that the worker did the right thing in a difficult moment.
The problem is that most workers don’t know what a Section 15(2) record looks like, don’t know which fields are legally required, and don’t have time to look it up mid-shift. That’s the gap that structured documentation tools are designed to fill.
Clio catches restrictive practices automatically
Describe your shift in plain English. If you used a restrictive practice — even if you didn’t realise it — Clio identifies it, generates the full Section 15(2) legal record, checks it against the participant’s BSP, and documents everything required for reporting.
Try Clio for free →